Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:20:46 -0800 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c Message-ID: <422F306E.5040200@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <20050309003804.J721@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200503082325.j28NPkY5032559@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050308194137.J811@odysseus.silby.com> <422E84E6.1030508@samsco.org> <20050309003804.J721@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Scott Long wrote: > >> Yes, the hw.busdma tree has quite a bit of stats regarding bounce page >> use. >> >> Scott > > > Ah, I see that now. As a followup, is there a way to force bouncing, as > a means of stressing situations like this one? I checked the busdma > manpage quickly, but I didn't consult the source. :) > > Maybe we should put all testing code under a STRESS_TEST define, kinda > like I have MBUF_STRESS_TEST hiding the mbuf fragmenting code at the > moment. I find the STRESS_TEST ifdef pollution complicates the code unnecessarily. The existing code feels like it belongs in a private branch and not in public CVS. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?422F306E.5040200>