Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Jun 2001 08:41:40 +0200
From:      Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
Cc:        Akinori MUSHA <knu@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security Makefile ports/security/ruby-pam Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist 
Message-ID:  <200106010639.f516dK690925@gratis.grondar.za>
In-Reply-To: <20010531234359.C46826@hamlet.nectar.com> ; from "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>  "Thu, 31 May 2001 23:43:59 EST."
References:  <20010531234359.C46826@hamlet.nectar.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Huh, I wonder why the PAM modules don't have the right dependency?
> 
>   $ objdump -p /usr/lib/pam_unix.so
> 
>   pam_unix.so:     file format elf32-i386
>   [......]
> 
>   Dynamic Section:
>     NEEDED      libutil.so.3
>     NEEDED      libcrypt.so.2
>     SONAME      pam_unix.so
>   [......]

Because there is a _horrible_ circular dependancy.

The modules are needed to build the (static) libpam.a

The modules depend on libpam(.so.N).

How to build?

I'm working on it - ideas welcome.

M
-- 
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106010639.f516dK690925>