Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Oct 1999 15:32:14 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Alex Charalabidis <alex@wnm.net>
To:        David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, root@totally.morphed.com
Subject:   Re: arplookup....
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.4.05.9910141523230.7899-100000@earth.wnm.net>
In-Reply-To: <199910141803.LAA36450@pau-amma.whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, David Wolfskill wrote:

> >Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:33:47 -0600 (MDT)
> >From: "Jason L. Schwab" <root@totally.morphed.com>
> 
> >I run a 3.3-STABLE box on  a T3 network, and I own 64 ips out of a c class
> >those 64 ips are between XXX.XXX.XXX.134 tho XXX.XXX.XXX.198 and There i
> >dont own or use 207.66.106.1 .. but i'm always getting these messages.
> >Altho I do have firewall rules that use 207.66.106.0/24, could that be the
> >problem? Please help!
> 
> >arplookup 207.66.106.1 failed: host is not on local network
> >...
> 
> Yes.  Tell the machine the truth about the network it's on -- specify an
> appropriate netmask for the actual circumstances.
> 
> If you tell it /24, that means that 207.66.106.1 is on the local
> network.  In your case, it would seem that /26 would be a better choice
> (though you might be able to use (e.g.) /27 or /28, if you subnet your /26).
> 
This is an arbitrary block of 65 addresses within a /24, not a properly
subnetted class c. I suggest the class c be subnetted in a consistent
manner and you get a real /26 like 207.66.106.128-191.

-ac

-- 
Alex Charalabidis
WebNet Memphis
(901) 432-6000



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.05.9910141523230.7899-100000>