Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:27:15 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Splitting devel/subversion into SEVERAL ports -- how fine-grained do we want to see it? Message-ID: <102401544.20140608162715@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20140608121614.18ab5996@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <1438330868.20140608001618@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20140608121614.18ab5996@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Tijl. You wrote 8 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3., 14:16:14: TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just TC> wait for subpackages support. You may want to merge all those ports TC> back into one port then. It is second way. But I didn't seen any estimations about subpackages support, and "separate mod_dav_svn" is request which I got twice a month. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?102401544.20140608162715>