Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:38:37 -0400 From: Kevin Phair <phair.kevin@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How are ports built now Message-ID: <5394837D.80901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BC88D0CCB9E6BF97D053661F@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <FF2053FA1B75B463D14C7152@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20140607202241.GA59544@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <F15EFF113780A8A629B44407@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <53938114.9060303@gmx.de> <BC88D0CCB9E6BF97D053661F@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/8/14, 11:20 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> wrote: > >> >> >> Do you see which port is looping? >> Perhaps a port was moved / renamed / removed and portmaster therfore is >> looping around >> >> Sadly I cannot help more since I used all the years tinderbox / >> poudriere >> to build packages. >> > > I've been working on this for two days now, so the parameters have > changed a bit. But here's an example of what prompted my question: > > This is the result of portmaster -ad > > ===>>> All >> (18) > > [[stuff]] > > ===>>> Proceed? y/n [y] n > > This is the result of pkg upgrade -n > > # pkg upgrade -n > Updating repository catalogue > Upgrades have been requested for the following 150 packages: > > [[different stuff]] > The upgrade will require 426 MB more space > > 373 MB to be downloaded > > Clearly portmaster and pkg upgrade disagree on what work needs to be > done. > Do you have non-default port options configured? I believe the packages are all created with the default options, so that if you've installed everything from ports, and some of those ports with non-default options, your dependencies when upgrading with portmaster could end up looking different than when upgrading with pkg.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5394837D.80901>