Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:58:23 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tap(4): will it be more reasonable if it preserved UP/DOWN state, when closed? Message-ID: <551C780F.4050202@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551BC4D5.9010006@quip.cz> References: <551B3021.4050206@rawbw.com> <551BC4D5.9010006@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/01/2015 03:13, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Doesn't sysctl net.link.tap.up_on_open=1 fix your problem? net.link.tap.up_on_open only works on open. I am going to create the corresponding net.link.tap.down_on_close. It will have 3 values: 0: up/down state will not change on close 1: (default) state will be preserved as it was before close - makes sense for most users I believe 2: state will change to down (like tap works now) Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?551C780F.4050202>