Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:25:17 -0600 (MDT) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: Elliott Perrin <eperrin@bigorbit.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Three interface routing problem Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010242219190.98567-100000@rapidnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20001025040747.307DB9EE01@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > xl0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.115 netmask 255.255.255.248 > > xl2 xxx.xxx.xxx..129 netmask 255.255.255.240 > > Do we support VLSM? I've never had a problem using them. The above addresses seem to be valid in their given subnets. Nick Rogness - Drive defensively. Buy a tank. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010242219190.98567-100000>