Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:22:38 -0500 From: Rob <bitabyss@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. Message-ID: <4761DADE.3010204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071214011614.GA18559@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20071214010542.GA19553@demeter.hydra> <200712132012.32729.mike.jeays@rogers.com> <20071214011614.GA18559@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jerry McAllister wrote: >> <flamebait>Bash has all the features one is likely to need for interactive use >> as well, and one could make a good case for it being the 'standard' shell >> now.</flamebait> Yeah, right... when Penguins Fly (hahahaha) [that was intended as a joke and dumb linux reference] > I find bash to be ugly and hate it for interactive use. > I would rather just use /bin/sh. ////jerry Seriously, Jerry, what do you dislike about it? If you ignore its features, it's no different from sh that I've seen. -R
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4761DADE.3010204>