Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:33:21 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: Sean Ellis <sellis@telus.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: web write-up Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10301081832320.1906-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net> In-Reply-To: <3E1C5D98.7060304@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Personally - I dont care what some lamer writer said - what I CARE about is that I SLEEP at nite since switching to fbsd.. the fbsd programmers saved me from tossin myself off a roof! On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Bill Moran wrote: > Sean Ellis wrote: > > Hello freebsd-questions, > > > > I wonder if anyone has any comment on this web article. The results > > of the benchmarking seem to portray FreeBSD in a less than > > favourable light. > > > > http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm > > It looks like garbage to me. He doesn't give enough information to > reproduce his results, though I strongly suspect the FreeBSD box > has softupdates disabled, and is therefore going to be slower. > > His writeup isn't even very good. On the initial page he claims > they tested with FreeBSD, but on sidebar #2 he claims they used > OpenBSD. > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10301081832320.1906-100000>