Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:13:51 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Kushnir <kushn@mail.kar.net> To: Wiliam Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com> Cc: FBSD_QUESTIONS <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, FBSD_CURRENT <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: pgcc-1.1.1 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901040005470.34115-100000@kushnir.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <005501be3737$d091d620$f301040a@c063.beaverton.stream.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Wiliam Woods wrote: > Anyone here useing pgcc-1.1.1 as their compiler of choice, to replace gcc? I > have been debating playing with this on my "spare" system. > Any reports from someone useing this, good or bad? Not sure if I'd like to replace gcc, especially for kernel, but I'm using pgcc (both C, and C++, and g77) for userland here, mostly as a matter of speed-up (yep, I know that's not what egcs is intended for, but all the same some of us need fast code). Works fine. Only question: does anybody know why Linux cross-compiled (within emulation) code runs _much_ faster? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > Regards, Vladimir ===========================|======================= Vladimir Kushnir | kushn@mail.kar.net, | Powered by FreeBSD kushnir@ap3.bitp.kiev.ua | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901040005470.34115-100000>