Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:32:14 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael V. Harding" <mvh@netcom.com> To: agifford@infowest.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND 8.* and STABLE Message-ID: <199802260032.QAA02852@netcom1.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <34F48785.343D8C39@infowest.com> (agifford@infowest.com) References: <199802251353.IAA00561@pandora.hh.kew.com> <34F48785.343D8C39@infowest.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bind 8 has some significant advantages as well, and some neat configuration options that don't exist on 4.9.6, like being able to use access control. No new code changes are going into 4.9.x - why not make the leap? The data files can be the same, and there is a conversion script for the configuration file. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 21:05:09 +0000 From: "Aaron D. Gifford" <agifford@infowest.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-UIDL: 8ef23f6953a1a5540657c5855804ae8b Drew Derbyshire wrote: > > Any reason I can't take the BIND port in the CURRENT ports collection > and install it on -STABLE? I know the thing builds, but that > doesn't say I won't cripple my system when the resolver library > gets replaced. > > I also notice the install seems dummied out in the BIND makefile, > any idea why? > > -ahd- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message I would LOVE to see BIND 8 make its way into -STABLE. That way I won't have to keep reinstalling BIND 8 after every "make world" overwrites it with the older version. :) Aaron out. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802260032.QAA02852>