Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:10:42 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system. Message-ID: <199904101510.JAA08971@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904100904470.378-100000@picnic.mat.net> References: <199904100551.WAA93232@bubba.whistle.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904100904470.378-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As long as we can bring it in conditionally, have libgcj is possibly > more important to FreeBSD than you'd think. Realize there are a large > number of us out there doing Java development (I'm only doing it for > classes now, but there's a lot of folks doing this) and since there's no > Java2 yet for FreeBSD, it's a drawback. I have Solaris7 at my elbow > here, *extremely* unwillingly, only because I need Java2. Is libgcj and the like Java2 compliant? I was under the impression that it was less 'featureful' than the JDK1 stuff the porting team released? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904101510.JAA08971>