Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:23:52 -0400 (EDT) From: mikej@trigger.net To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HTT on current Message-ID: <1764.63.139.119.223.1061605432.squirrel@webmail.trigger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030822230857.GA99046@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <JCEIKJMCANNPGKFKGLKLIEEGDIAA.mikej@trigger.net><XFMail.20030822170247.jhb@FreeBSD.org><1353.63.139.119.223.1061593383.squirrel@webmail.trigger.net> <20030822230857.GA99046@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 07:03:03PM -0400, mikej@trigger.net wrote: >> > That is not an SMP kernel. An SMP kernel (with APIC_IO) would not >> print >> > out >> > the pcib0 interrupt routing messages. >> > >> > -- >> >> So whats the problem here? > > See above. >> How come the CPUs dont show up in top. > > See above. > >> How do i realy know the system sees 2, and actually utilizes them? >> Is there anything else i have to do other than enable SMP options in >> the kernel? > > Enable *ALL* of the SMP options in the kernel. See above. > > Kris Well i've enabled all SMP options, recompiled and rebooted. The CPUs now properly show up in dmesg and i can see the C header in top. However no processes seem to be being assigned to cpu 1. Why is the schedueler only using CPU 0? This wasnt the behaviour in stable. Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1764.63.139.119.223.1061605432.squirrel>