Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 May 1999 15:06:08 +0100
From:      Mark Ovens <marko@uk.radan.com>
To:        mavery@mail.otherwhen.com
Cc:        FreeBSD Chat <chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Europe says yes to spam
Message-ID:  <37383950.AE14A41D@uk.radan.com>
References:  <199905111355.IAA15943@hostigos.otherwhen.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Avery wrote:
> 
> On 11 May 99, at 10:03, Mark Ovens wrote:
> 
> > Greg Lehey wrote:
> > >
> > > Just saw this on the aussie-isp list.
> 
> > > > The European Parliament has voted to legalise spam. The European
> > > > Internet Service Providers Association (EuroISPA) campaigned against
> > > > the idea, a UK MEP made a passionate speech to ban junk email and
> > > > nobody spoke in favour of it. Despite this, it was passed 266 votes to
> > > > 137. A clause to ban the harvesting of email addresses from newsgroups
> > > > and web sites was removed before the bill was passed.
> 
> > :-(. Mind you, about 90% of the spam I receive comes from the USA so
> > I'm not sure what good it would have done had they voted the other
> > way. Many (most?) of this junk e-mail includes a statement that under some
> > Bill or other it is not classed as spam. Obviously the US legislators use
> > a different definition of spam/junk e-mail to those of us in the real
> > world.
> 
> Not really.  The law that is referred to hasn't been passed, so it
> isn't a law.  At least not yet.  Also, the law, if passed, prohibits
> forging addresses and requires that the spam has a *WORKING* opt-
> out mechanism.  All the ones I've seen have neither.
> 
> Their comment about being in compliance with the law are as
> specious as those made by many anti-spam people who threaten to
> charge spammers service fees.  In the end, neither has a firm
> connection to reality.
> 
> > There is also another law being proposed by the EU which would make
> > the local caching of Web pages by ISP's effectively illegal (something
> > related to copyright IIRC).
> 
> *sigh*  We may need to have a "stupid politician" contest.

Nah, there would be too many winners ;-)

> Of course, if we notify the honorees, they might consider
> it a compliment.
> 
> However, based on my limited knowledge of copyright laws, I would
> think that if the material provider approved caching of their
> material, it would become a "fair use".  As I recall, there is a HTML
> flag that indicates whether a page may be cached.  So the furor may
> be a "non-issue".  The only big issue here is that copyright laws are
> often enforceable by international treaty.... so some poor net-admin
> on the other side of the planet could be hassled for no good reason.
> 
> > > > Net users are required to register with national opt-out lists if they
> > > > do not wish to receive junk email.
> 
> If it worked, I'd sign up in a heartbeat.
> 

Ditto

> Mike
> 
> ======================================================================
> Mike Avery                            MAvery@mail.otherwhen.com
>                                           (409)-842-2942 (work)
>                                                   ICQ: 16241692
> 
> * Spam is for lusers who can't get business any other way *
> 
> A Randomly Selected Thought For The Day:
> Karaoke is a Japanese word meaning "tone deaf".
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message

-- 
      FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org
      My Webpage http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~markov
_______________________________________________________________
Mark Ovens, CNC Apps Engineer, Radan Computational Ltd. Bath UK
CAD/CAM solutions for Sheetmetal Working Industry
mailto:marko@uk.radan.com                  http://www.radan.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37383950.AE14A41D>