Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 18:51:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X Message-ID: <3B1AE986.1E2EAE88@DougBarton.net> References: <15127.61125.223478.210748@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Meyer wrote: > > Various ports test NO_X, WITHOUT_X, or WITHOUT_X11 to see if they > should build without X support. The make.conf man page was recently > changed to indicate to users that WITHOUT_X is the variable to use for > that. My searches of the -ports archive didn't turn up anything, so > there may not have been sufficient discussion of it before this > happened. If we're going to change anyway I'd like to suggest that we change to variable names that are more self evident. How about something like NO_X_BASE and NO_X_PORTS? Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B1AE986.1E2EAE88>