Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:18:55 -0500 From: "Steve Bertrand" <iaccounts@ibctech.ca> To: "'RW'" <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Release engineering confusion Message-ID: <20051117001903.08B0043D55@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200511170004.31463.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > In production (at an ISP), what is the best to > follow...RELENGX_X or > > RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is > > being prepared for the same. > > See the Handbook: > > 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook pretty much clarifies that a production environment should *not* track either STABLE or CURRENT. So I'm assuming I'm best off with RELENG_6_0 etc, etc? Does anyone here actually run STABLE or CURRENT in a production environment? I've personally had the most luck with RELENG_4 which is still my main box, but now my curiosity has got the best of me. Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051117001903.08B0043D55>