Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 15:14:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198581] dns/unbound: add aaaa-filter option from contrib patch within the source tarball Message-ID: <bug-198581-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198581 Bug ID: 198581 Summary: dns/unbound: add aaaa-filter option from contrib patch within the source tarball Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: sem@FreeBSD.org Reporter: darksoul@darkbsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(sem@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: sem@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 154300 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154300&action=edit Adds the AAAA_FILTER option to the config menu, along with patching from the file contrib/aaaa-filter-iterator.patch which is in the unbound source I have developed a patch recently to implement within unbound functionality similar to BIND's "filter-aaaa" option. This feature not being readily available is one major reason Japanese ISPs can not leave BIND behind. (Physical carriers such as NTT roll out their own in-house closed IPv6 routing, over which ISPs have no control, if they don't themselves provide IPv6 service to the customers) It has been included in unbound's contrib/ starting with the latest version (1.5.1), but was initially developped for version 1.4.17. The patch applies properly on any version above so far, so I was thinking adding a Makefile option, and a clause in the "post-patch:" section to apply it. I have included a proposal of Makefile, along with a diff explaining what changes I have done. I am willing to provide whatever help is required. I was also wondering one thing, since the binaries generated will ultimately be quite different, should the option alter the package name? I have not done so, but I fear a miscalculated port update after tuning repositories might have dramatic effects, so I thought one way to avoid the headache would be to have a different package name. Thanks in advance for your time, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-198581-13>