Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 01 May 2003 16:30:30 -0400
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        gcn53@vfemail.net
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problem with networking?
Message-ID:  <3EB183E6.7090008@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <1051820707.3eb182a3273f6@www.vfemail.net>
References:  <1051818955.3eb17bcb36c53@www.vfemail.net> <002a01c3101f$026267e0$ca0110ac@vinyl.tkvbp.com> <1051820707.3eb182a3273f6@www.vfemail.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
gcn53@vfemail.net wrote:
> Quoting Kliment Andreev <klimenta@futurebit.com>:
>>Send us :
>>
>># ifconfig -a
> 
> fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 209.237.255.52 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.237.255.52
>         ether 00:03:47:e7:53:ff
>         media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex>
>         status: active
> lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> faith0: flags=8002<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
> ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552

That netmask looks pretty wrong.  Something like ffffff00 sounds more
reasonable, although I can't be sure whether that's right either.

I can think of a very limited number of cases where the primary IP on
an ethernet card should have the netmask you have.  Verify it.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EB183E6.7090008>