Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:07:05 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Subject: cluster vs. PORTREVISION (Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/djvulibre...) Message-ID: <200507161007.06427@aldan> In-Reply-To: <20050716053608.GA10863@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200507132352.j6DNqtUS011697@repoman.freebsd.org> <200507151751.30130.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050716053608.GA10863@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 16 July 2005 01:36 am, Kris Kennaway wrote: = The cluster does mind, because I do not have enough machines to waste = cycles on gratuitous rebuilds. šAlso, the FTP sites mind when the = waste bandwidth on gratuitous downloads. But the package-building scripts _can_ be modified to track dependencies without relying on PORTREVISION, cat they not? And portupgrade does not need the variable either. Also, for releases you do a full rebuild from scratch anyway too, right? -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507161007.06427>