Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:14:45 +0100 From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com To: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd? Message-ID: <20090531201445.GA82420@logik.internal.network> In-Reply-To: <A5BB2D2B836A4438B1B7BD8420FCC6A3@uk.tiscali.intl> References: <20090530175239.GA25604@logik.internal.network> <20090530144354.2255f722@bhuda.mired.org> <20090530191840.GA68514@logik.internal.network> <20090530162744.5d77e9d1@bhuda.mired.org> <A5BB2D2B836A4438B1B7BD8420FCC6A3@uk.tiscali.intl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009-05-31 13:13:24, krad wrote: > Please don't whack gstripe and zfs together. It should work but is ugly and > you might run into issues. Getting out of them will be harder than a pure > zfs solution Yeah, will be using pure ZFS having read everything I can find on it so far. I was skeptical of ZFS at first as it appeared to have come out of nowhere but it seems it's older (and more mature) than I thought. > ZFS does support striping by default across vdevs > > Eg > > Zpool create data da1 > Zpool add data da2 > > Would create a striped data set across da1 and da2 What kind of performance gain can I expect from this? I'm purely thinking about performance now - the integrity checking stuff of ZFS is a pleasant extra. > Just for fun here is one of the configs off one of our sun x4500 at work, > its opensolaris not freebsd, but it is zfs. One whoping big array of ~ 28 TB Impressive! > Hope this helps, im really looking forward to zfs maturing on bsd and having > pure zfs systems 8) Absolutely. xw
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090531201445.GA82420>