Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:26:27 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Building new Athlon AMD64 Socket 939 or 940 machine Message-ID: <20051128102626.A31626@cons.org> In-Reply-To: <438B1F90.3090708@FreeBSD.org>; from sos@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:17:36PM %2B0100 References: <61FBEC57-424E-450F-A775-10E1F5E8DF92@cian.ws> <20051127215510.A17131@cons.org> <1133190443.41553.18.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <438B1F90.3090708@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >>I have a DFI SLI-DRI which is NForce 4 based and I am overall amazed > >>how well it works. In particular the SATA controller (only tested the > >>first 4 ports). > >> > >> > > > >Out of interest, does FreeBSD correctly notice the hot-inserting of SATA > >drives on this board? I'm fighting with an NForce 4 based system at the > >moment which notices the hot removal but needs a reboot before it > >notices a new drive has been inserted (under FreeBSD, Linux and > >Solaris). > > > > > That used to work on my MSI nf4 board on 6.0 forward. Can I safely test this by just plugging in a SATA cable with drive and board on? Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051128102626.A31626>