Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:01:07 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, papowell@astart.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues Message-ID: <20000710100107.A21595@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <791.963228136@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>; from "Sheldon Hearn" on Mon Jul 10 13:22:16 GMT 2000 References: <20000710035127.B92445@dragon.nuxi.com> <791.963228136@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 10), Sheldon Hearn said: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 03:51:27 MST, "David O'Brien" wrote: > > Not an issue. If LPRng were imported into src/contib/, there would > > be BSD make Makefiles that we create in /usr/src/usr.bin/..... > > Do you have ideas on how to handle the optional features of the > package, such as mysql support? The author listed a few features > which would rely on packages in the ports tree. This was the reason > I felt that LPRng is better suited to being provided as a port. There's no reason to remove the port; it'll be just like the gcc port, which includes languages not installed into the base OS (java & objc). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000710100107.A21595>