Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:40:36 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: set_rcvar() removed from rc.subr Message-ID: <4F129104.90805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120115021101.11615318@cox.net> References: <4F114577.30201@FreeBSD.org> <4F119C40.2080503@gwdg.de> <CADLo838LsSkHjM7JFQEqfC6D5R29he%2BfjgxaBho_S7EdEzZgZA@mail.gmail.com> <20120115021101.11615318@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/15/2012 00:11, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Chris, if you're working on fixing ports' rc files Thanks for taking a look at this. FYI, all of the rc.d scripts that are actually in the ports tree have already been fixed. The outliers at this point are scripts that are included in the distfiles. Some of those even have patches in the tree already, and they were updated in the same sweep. While we certainly try to enforce <filename> == PROVIDE == $name for scripts that are in the tree, it can't be guaranteed that this is true for scripts that are not, so if name=foo, rcvar should be foo_enable. hth, Doug -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F129104.90805>