Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:10:16 -0300 From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Generate plist from install_manifest.txt when port uses CMake? Message-ID: <87mxky6gdz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimm0Nkuoe-8EGhoDu%2B0R0oHPMp3P6dkP_0wW=PV@mail.gmail.com> <877hc36k4h.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTim7e4iJ1hm9sr8oK4UQmXS3R7ccS_0kyptX5mBu@mail.gmail.com> <87r5aa6hmh.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTik=rUGNF2FT%2BYy7EcUfCrhT%2BZ=AEinjafgwmktA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Nope, I mean if the plist is completely automatically generated, how are >> you going to add commands to it, such as "@dirrm" or any other? In the >> Makefile? > > Are they actually needed? I can't come up with example when i need to put > something into plist, if everything in it already generated automatically. > The initial idea was to get rid of writing something into plist by hand. I might be missing something here, but I think they sometimes are. Taking devel/cmake itself as an example, it has a few @dirrm and @dirrmtry entries in the end which seem to make sense to exist. Either way, using install_manifest.txt even as a hint does sounds useful to me too. P.S.: There's no need to CC me in the responses, just mailing freebsd-ports should be fine :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87mxky6gdz.fsf>