Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:09:34 -0600 From: Christopher Farley <chris@northernbrewer.com> To: James Lim <jameslpin@pacific.net.sg> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netbsd 1.5 Message-ID: <20001206230934.A56204@northernbrewer.com> In-Reply-To: <018c01c0600a$86e3f640$fa5e78cb@gchang>; from jameslpin@pacific.net.sg on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 12:59:48PM %2B0800 References: <001401c06001$83582680$5ac809c0@xyf> <20001206225310.A56114@northernbrewer.com> <018c01c0600a$86e3f640$fa5e78cb@gchang>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
James Lim (jameslpin@pacific.net.sg) wrote: > Hi all, > > I just read the release notes from www.bsdtoday.com on netbsd > 1.5. It seems to be the other way round as sendmail is replaced by postfix > :) Hooray! Ding dong, the witch is dead... In this case, it would seem that FreeBSD could indeed "learn something" from NetBSD. Can't we have a campaign to banish Sendmail to the ports collection? The FreeBSD handbook could shrink dramatically if Postfix were the default MTA. -- Christopher Farley Northern Brewer / 1150 Grand Avenue / St. Paul, MN 55105 www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001206230934.A56204>