Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:27:47 +0000 From: Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/6.0R schedule.sgml Message-ID: <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200510091329.j99DT5Bv001028@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200510091329.j99DT5Bv001028@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:29:05PM +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote: > hrs 2005-10-09 13:29:05 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en/releases/6.0R schedule.sgml > Log: > Document the actual date when RELENG_6_0 branch is created. Is it time to also bump RELENG_6_0 to 6.0-RC1, and RELENG_6 to 6.0-STABLE or 6.0-PRERELEASE? I think that's the traditional practice...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051009162747.GA51517>