Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:41:38 +0200 (MET DST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/wine/patches/patch-da Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005151337220.2601-100000@nunki.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Mikhail, I am currently trying to update the Wine port in FreeBSD's port collection and I've got a question concerning the patch from you that I mentioned in the subject. A similiar change has been made to the Wine master sources (which means that your patch won't apply any longer), but in the "official" patch we have if (((*data = ptrace( PTRACE_PEEKDATA, thread->unix_pid, addr, 0 )) ... while your patch has if (((*data = ptrace( PTRACE_PEEKDATA, thread->unix_pid, addr, *data )) ... What do you think about this? Which of these versions is the one we should take (and possibly submit to the Wine folks)? Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0005151337220.2601-100000>