Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Mar 1996 14:02:38 +0200 (EET)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc:        "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Win32
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960317135913.4795A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <199603171158.MAA09452@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Eat good food, preserve nature, be nice to all nice people :)

On Sun, 17 Mar 1996, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:

> [Subject shortened]
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Two things that  can can attract more individuals to  FreeBSD:
> > 
> > o ability to run Win32 applications -- hows the Willows Project coming along?
> 
> I think the main problem with Willows is performance. Apps are run under
> an interpreter (xwin) either interpreted or 'native'.
> I have run winmine.exe and sol.exe and though they run quite correct
> performance isn't something that knocks you off of your socks.
> 
> Also I think one would have to dump X11 in favor of a native Win32 graphics 
> kernel or build a Win32 graphics kernel into X.
>

And that (dumping X) will also be the reason more numerous people will 
not use it.
 
> I don't know whether a different approach like running PE format and
> other MS .exe formats native under FreeBSD would be feasable.
> 

It should be possible to run them as efficently as the Linux programs.

> When MS developed NT they must have been faced with a similar problem
> but they solved it with convincing performance. And didn't they promise
> us POSIX layers and X11 and what not when I recall the first overhead
> foils that had been presented by DEC and NT apostels a couple of years ago?
> 
> 
> > 
> >    A few people that I have spoken  to have said that if they could run
> >    win32 apps they would use freebsd. The funny thing is that I didn't
> >    notice a hesitation on their part 8)
> > 
> >    Another reason, is to attract Win32 application developers to FreeBSD.
> > 
> >    Perhaps, I am naive however I think that many would love to dump 
> >    Win3.1 and Win95.
> 
> [fast internet connection / ISDN issues deleted]
> 
> > 
> > 
> >    Amancio	
> > 
> 
> --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960317135913.4795A-100000>