Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:53:20 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: "Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: standards@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: very big files on cd9660 file system Message-ID: <200508251153.21086.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <863boytdbi.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200508191942.26723.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050820142802.E60211@delplex.bde.org> <863boytdbi.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ISO9660 does not use 64-bit values. Those 8-byte values you see in > the headers are 32-bit values stored first in little-endian format and > second in big-endian format. So, in my original question, the blame lies solely with 3) ISO-9660 standard ? No single file on a ISO9660 filesystem may exceed 4Gb? Is there some newer, superceeding backwards-compatible standard -- all the new DVD devices are now offering the media to store large files? Or is fat32 the only cross-platform option today? -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508251153.21086.mi%2Bmx>