Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:24:03 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Cc:        Raimund Steger <rs@mytum.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Subject:   Re: Recent STABLE unable to start process in background
Message-ID:  <4E434B53.4090202@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK3bwFygV8Q2CuW5=YLp_qc53aUyJBbzzqajLpXx-rdLhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CA%2BtpaK1Gv4nPVxAqi0pWOBJSKpOpBV1ExDKPrW7KCburmS7C1w@mail.gmail.com> <4E431C3A.6080707@mytum.de> <20110811012207.GA86377@icarus.home.lan> <CA%2BtpaK3bwFygV8Q2CuW5=YLp_qc53aUyJBbzzqajLpXx-rdLhQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/10/2011 19:51, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>wrote:
> 
>>> Looks like SIGTTOU (output from background process)?
>>> This should be controllable with stty -tostop.
>>> (But why has it changed...?)
>>
>> On all our RELENG_8 systems (though I use bash), -tostop is default.
>>
> 
> Hm, it seems there might be something wrong with zsh.
> 
> stty -a on an old and new setup produces identical output with -tostop set.
> The old setup runs zsh-4.3.10_3 which works correctly, but zsh-4.3.12
> doesn't work on the new.  The latest bash works fine on the new.  I can file
> a bug report on zsh, but could someone confirm that it's the likely
> candidate for a problem so I don't send anyone on a wild goose chase?

Back up the old zsh on the working system, install the new one, test.



-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E434B53.4090202>