Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:11:20 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>, Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Subject: Re: ports requiring OpenSSL not honouring OpenSSL from ports Message-ID: <535E99C8.7050309@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <86eh0hsq3w.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <201404271508.s3RF8sMA014085@catnip.dyslexicfish.net> <AFCC7276-2C8F-423E-A417-AE492F5162E6@vpnc.org> <CAK-wPOhxRtCxCsxE1Y5UvL-U18FOnhgMMfH7gDZ5PHZp_sH_5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAK-wPOi60JMc%2BR2zkmLvoJGu6_AFTHcgrUKHpZUy1qgHSEVG2Q@mail.gmail.com> <86eh0hsq3w.fsf@nine.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/28/14, 6:30 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org> writes: >> I realized that we don't really need any extravagance from ld at all. >> Move the files for the base version of openssl to a different >> location, and replace them with symlinks. > ...and break your system. > > OpenSSL 0.9.x and 1.0.x are *not* binary compatible. are they somewhat "API" compatible? can you compile most code against either? > > DES
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?535E99C8.7050309>