Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 17:58:08 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: "Tani Hosokawa" <unknown@riverstyx.net>, "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org> Cc: <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>, <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <000101bece5d$1a9b0540$021d85d1@youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907141739150.689-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Any time I've ever heard of this particular point being raised it was to > boost FreeBSD, since it's easier to develop for a single platform. For > example, the NTP people dropped official support of Linux because of the > frequency of changes to the kernel, as well as the difficulty in making it > work on all flavours of Linux. They mentioned FreeBSD specifically as a > more stable platform developer-wise. Amusing, considering that the latest versions of NTP run fine on Linux and break on FreeBSD. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000101bece5d$1a9b0540$021d85d1>