Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:52:29 -0500
From:      "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>
To:        "Matthew Seaman" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@stilyagin.com>, Atom Powers <atom.powers@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" <freebsd@hub.org>
Subject:   Re: BSDstats: Just added - Vendor Stats
Message-ID:  <ef10de9a0608270852j37b6475fwde2850c0e957389f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44F1A5E4.20801@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <20060826223927.I82634@hub.org> <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> <df9ac37c0608262100w59ee80d9maa58902d5dd35c24@mail.gmail.com> <ef10de9a0608262208k7d53fb3cs3c8623dab998f782@mail.gmail.com> <44F1A5E4.20801@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/27/06, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> Nikolas Britton wrote:
>
> > What I think is interesting is the only ~50% uptake of FreeBSD/amd64
> > on 64-bit x86 capable systems. FreeBSD/i386 takes ~90% of the pie.
> > Also the less then 1% uptake of sparc64 and alpha ports and 0% for
> > FreeBSD/PPC. Maybe we should can some of these platform ports, how
> > much overhead do they add to the project?
>
> Woah! It's way, way too soon to start making any decisions based on the
> bsdstats site.  There's less than a thousand machines reporting stats
> so far -- that's a very small fraction of the FreeBSD total machines
> around the world.  As it is a single small company or user with half
> a dozen machines submitting their data could have a radical effect on
> the ordering of many of the tables available on the site.
>
> The BSD Stats site is going to need some serious popularization before
> it provides a statistically significant sample.  It would probably take
> getting the 300.bsdstats periodic job incorporated into the base
> system and having a 'please register your system' option fairly
> prominently displayed in the installer for several releases to make it
> really effective.
>

I'm being devils advocate here, we don't need to make any rash
decisions etc... It's just something to think about.


-- 
BSD Podcasts @:
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef10de9a0608270852j37b6475fwde2850c0e957389f>