Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:29:15 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default Message-ID: <4EE6AA6B.6020803@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE69C5A.3090005@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com> <4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4EE69C5A.3090005@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/12/11 19:29, Doug Barton wrote: > [...] > > I switched to 4BSD, problem gone. > > [...] Ditto. If there's some common situation where the average user would have a perceptibly better experience with ULE, let's go for it. But when there's a plausible usage scenario in which ULE gives OVER AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE worse performance[1], making ULE the default seems like a bad choice. -- George Mitchell [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-December/064773.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE6AA6B.6020803>