Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:06:45 +0700
From:      Roger Merritt <mcrogerm@stjohn.ac.th>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Online Content Management Tool - question
Message-ID:  <5.2.0.9.0.20030627065808.00a248f0@127.0.0.1>
In-Reply-To: <BB208F82.34174%list@zettai.net>
References:  <20030626155713.M47040@enabled.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:54 PM 6/26/03, you wrote:
>[admin wrote (admin2@enabled.com) on 6/26/03 3:57 PM]
>
> >> Zope looked to me like overkill for my needs, and I don't really
> >> want a blog site.
> >>
> > Roger,
> >
> > thanks for the heads up here.  what is a blog site?
>
>Zope can be as big or small as you need and is certainly in no way limited
>to weblogs.

Well, thanks for telling me. If I have time I'll take another look at it, 
but I was frankly daunted by their website. I got the impression that zope 
was primarily designed for weblogs and outside news feeds, and it seems to 
be *big*. The intranet I'm trying to set up will have pretty static 
content, but I want to use a content management system to make it easier 
for the teachers to update their course outlines and homework assignments.

Incidentally, I wanted to emphasize that my problem (mentioned earlier) 
with MkDoc was due to my own lack of skills. I think if I'd had more time 
to play with my /etc/hosts file and my http.conf I could have had it 
working. I don't think there's any problem with MkDoc, and it looks really 
good. I liked their default templates, and they claim to strongly implement 
the W3C standards for accessibility.


-- 
Roger



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.0.9.0.20030627065808.00a248f0>