Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 07:04:40 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> To: Jesse <j@lumiere.net> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Brock Tellier <btellier@usa.net>, Bill Swingle <unfurl@dub.net>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Re: [btellier@USA.NET: Several FreeBSD-3.3 vulnerabilities] ] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912020704020.89183-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9912012251010.86543-100000@leaf.lumiere.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yesterday, Jesse wrote: : Wouldn't it be reasonable, however, to expect the security officer to : redirect notifications to the proper maintainers? In most organizations, : if you contact the wrong person, they'll pass on your message to the : correct one. One might think one of the benefits of having a security : officer is not just a person to fix security holes (I doubt that's the job : description, anyway), but to help coordinate and assure that the : information gets to the right people. Isn't that what happened? Didn't Mr. Tellier say that the security officer had ``contacted the maintainers''? Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Owner/Administrator, zigg.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912020704020.89183-100000>