Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:56:09 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Johan Bucht <bucht@acc.umu.se> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: New libc malloc patch Message-ID: <439D10F9.6060004@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <439D04CF.1000204@acc.umu.se> References: <B6653214-2181-4342-854D-323979D23EE8@canonware.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0511291121360.27754@regurgitate.ugcs.caltech.edu> <0B746373-8C29-4ADF-9218-311AE08F3834@canonware.com> <b41c75520512031245q48521143m@mail.gmail.com> <7318D807-9086-4817-A40B-50D6960880FB@canonware.com> <b41c75520512040451t360eb01u@mail.gmail.com> <12CA5E15-D006-441D-A24C-1BCD1A69D740@canonware.com> <439CC5DA.3080103@elischer.org> <439CC939.5080703@freebsd.org> <20051212012907.GA13640@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051212043023.GA16678@xor.obsecurity.org> <439D04CF.1000204@acc.umu.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Johan Bucht wrote: > >> > Those times seems way too high even for a serial allocator, is > libpthread performance really this bad on amd64 or is it broken? > Not sure which thread library has been tested.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?439D10F9.6060004>