Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:31:33 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Mike Jeays" <mike.jeays@rogers.com>, "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. Message-ID: <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCMEDDCFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <200712132012.32729.mike.jeays@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mike Jeays > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:13 PM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. > > > <flamebait>Bash has all the features one is likely to need for > interactive use > as well, and one could make a good case for it being the 'standard' shell > now.</flamebait> > > The "standard" shell MUST be able to be statically compiled. You don't have access to all your nice dynamically loaded libraries when the only filesystem on your server that will mount is /, due to some disk error. Ted No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.1/1183 - Release Date: 12/13/2007 9:15 AM
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCMEDDCFAA.tedm>