Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:14:20 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c Message-ID: <20080529151233.I3678@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20080529140557.GA94385@gw.reifenberger.com> References: <200805261157.m4QBvnpF025029@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526144831.K26343@fledge.watson.org> <20080526140735.GA35960@gw.reifenberger.com> <200805281309.49683.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080529140557.GA94385@gw.reifenberger.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:09:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: ... > >> Maybe make it only work if it only matches a single jail? That would work >> for the common case while avoiding ambiguities in the complex cases. > > Yes. Thats a good suggestion and the road I'll go. Thanks! The other concept that might be of benefit is a "dead" jail vs. a "live" jail -- with TCP connections taking a while to run down, there can often be dangling jail references that don't garbage collect for a few minutes. Perhaps, where there is ambiguity, live jails (ones with referencing processes) should be preferred to dead ones. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080529151233.I3678>