Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 12:33:20 +1000 (EST) From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> To: danny@panda.hilink.com.au (Daniel O'Callaghan) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which fragments to discard (was Re: ipfw vs ipfilter) Message-ID: <199608200233.MAA08877@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960820112455.15538B-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> from "Daniel O'Callaghan" at Aug 20, 96 11:27:04 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel O'Callaghan writes: > Hmm, Aren't they the kind of fragment offsets you would see from someone > on a slip link with an MTU of 296? 34*8=272. Add 20 for IP and you get > 292. Seems kina harsh to me to refuse to talk to the handicapped. Except that the first fragment contained a different port number, nntp has it happens, which is disallowed here to all but a few external hosts, michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608200233.MAA08877>