Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jul 1997 02:08:03 +0200
From:      sthaug@nethelp.no
To:        terry@lambert.org
Cc:        andreas@klemm.gtn.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sendmail complains about being unable to write his pid file
Message-ID:  <24270.869443683@verdi.nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 20 Jul 1997 16:13:59 -0700 (MST)"
References:  <199707202313.QAA09972@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Yes, but the question stands - why is it setup this way? What is gained
> > by having binaries (and important directories) owned by bin instead of
> > root?
> 
> The ability to update machines remotely via NFS, which proxies root
> as "nobody" in most sane configurations.

Certainly - for a corresponding decrease in security. I'd like to have
the tighter security be the default. Or at least have it as an option
when installing.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24270.869443683>