Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:31:41 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        simon.roberts@earthlink.net
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Network monitoring
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.43.0411232025480.9521-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041124012148.9540.qmail@web52701.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Simon Roberts wrote:

> I apologize that this probably isn't the most relevant
> list to ask this on. Suggestions for better lists will
> be welcome.
>
> I'm trying to monitor traffice on a 100BaseT ethernet
> network link. I split the line, put a "hub" in and am
> trying to run tcpdump on a box off the side of the
> hub.
>
> Unfortunately, it turns out the hub isn't a hub, it's
> a "switching hub" (what's not a switch about this? I
> don't get it). Consequently, all I see are arp
> packets, bootp packets, and the odd broadcast. I went
> to a local store to buy a hub, and guess what, they
> sold me another switching hub, so that has to be
> returned :(
>
> So, the question is, can anyone tell me the
> manufacturer and product name of a real (dumb) hub? I
> could use 10baseT instead if necessary, I just need
> something cheap that is a simple repeater. Of course,
> nobody advertizes "our hub really is a totally dumb
> hub, not like those fancy switching hubs the
> competition sells" ;>

You could always go the other way and get a more capable
switch.  At least for the Cisco (3500XL series), you
can put a port in mirroring mode so that it sees all
traffic.  Sorry, I haven't any advice on real hubs.

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0411232025480.9521-100000>