Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:36:48 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <49CD1CC0.6030306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090327175328.GB86176@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200903120954.n2C9s2ev063133@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090313023956.GA49511@dragon.NUXI.org> <49BA52D2.8090209@FreeBSD.org> <20090323231412.GA94221@hub.freebsd.org> <20090324012325.GB1292@atarininja.org> <20090324043028.GA34952@dragon.NUXI.org> <p06240800c5f05d3db740@[128.113.24.47]> <1238056641.50303.6.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <p06240804c5f17be2e567@[128.113.24.47]> <1238108366.268.4.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090327175328.GB86176@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Weinberger escribió: >>> (03.26.2009 @ 1859 PST): Pav Lucistnik said, in 0.9K: << >>> >> Garance A Drosihn pí?e v ?t 26. 03. 2009 v 14:40 -0400: >> >> >>> Well, still, why rebuild *anything* because pkg-desc changed? >>> >> It's about the question - do you care what's on ftp mirrors? >> If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION. >> >> >>> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist" from Pav Lucistnik << >>> > > Just saying, why not have a line in the commit message that triggers a > rebuild without bumping the PORTREVISION. > > Package rebuild: yes > Or why not rebuilding them based on the md5 of the port's files then? I don't think it would be a big overhead. Only a small percent of ports commits don't change PORTVERSION/PORTREVISION. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49CD1CC0.6030306>