Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 08:52:39 GMT From: Marko Zec <zec@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 161468 for review Message-ID: <200905020852.n428qdvl020972@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=161468 Change 161468 by zec@zec_amdx2 on 2009/05/02 08:52:26 Postpone controversy / debate about M_REMOTE_VNET mbuf flag for some other commit / time - not just now... Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/vimage-commit2/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h#8 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/vimage-commit2/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h#8 (text+ko) ==== @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ #define M_PROTO7 0x00100000 /* protocol-specific */ #define M_PROTO8 0x00200000 /* protocol-specific */ #define M_FLOWID 0x00400000 /* flowid is valid */ -#define M_REMOTE_VNET 0x00800000 /* mbuf crossed boundary between two vnets */ /* * For RELENG_{6,7} steal these flags for limited multiple routing table * support. In RELENG_8 and beyond, use just one flag and a tag.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905020852.n428qdvl020972>