Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 22:26:07 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211021 - head/sys/dev/usb Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008082222500.3940@ury.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100807.204946.244264502672924047.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <201008071608.o77G8bNN088653@svn.freebsd.org> <20100807.204946.244264502672924047.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <201008071608.o77G8bNN088653@svn.freebsd.org> > Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org> writes: > : Author: gavin > : Date: Sat Aug 7 16:08:37 2010 > : New Revision: 211021 > : URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211021 > : > : Log: > : Sort this file a little better: the vendors are supposed to be sorted by > : vendor ID in the vendor section, and by symbolic name in the product > : section. Products are sorted by product ID. While here, get rid of a > : duplicate Microsoft Mouse entry, revealed by sorting. > > I thought products were sorted by the ID number, not the ID name. Yes, within a manufacturer, products should be sorted by ID. Each manufacturer section is sorted by the symbolic manufacturer name, though. I'm not which one of us is misunderstanding the other - do you think my change is somehow wrong? Thanks, Gavin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1008082222500.3940>