Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:19:26 +0200
From:      Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@web.de>
To:        Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sbp0:0:0 No ocb(260d628c) on the queue
Message-ID:  <200307191919.26710.manfred.lotz@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <ybsel0mpo18.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
References:  <200306291430.41237.manfred.lotz@web.de> <ybsel0mpo18.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 19 July 2003 16:52, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
> Some HDD's seems not to work with tagged queuing.
> try 'camcontrol [device id] tags -N 1'.
>

I was very much struggling the last weeks.  It seems that 'camcontrol tags =
da0=20
=2DN 1' did the trick.


=46rom what I have experienced it doesn't seem to be a problem of the HDD a=
lone.=20

I had tested the following (external HD + external IDE) combinations:
IBM HD + Rexon IDE/Firewire Controller:	works fine
IBM HD + Genesys IDE/Firewire Controller:  'No ocb..'-problem

Samsung HD + Rexon IDE/Firewire Controller:    'No ocb...'-problem
Samsung HD + Genesys IDE/Firewire Controller:  'No ocb...'-problem


Currently, I have the the combination IBM-HD + Genesys IDE Controller. As s=
aid=20
before turning off tagging seems to help.


Thanks a lot,
Manfred



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307191919.26710.manfred.lotz>