Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Apr 2001 02:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Harald Neuffer <neuf@stanley.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/26313: New Port: german/eagle: A tool for designing printed  circuit boards
Message-ID:  <200104230900.f3N906244400@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/26313; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Harald Neuffer <neuf@lrs.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
Cc: FreeBSD GNATS DB <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/26313: New Port: german/eagle: A tool for designing printed 
 circuit boards
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:56:59 +0200

 Will Andrews wrote:
 > 
 > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Harald Neuffer wrote:
 > > probably the wrong way to write directly to you instead using the GNATS
 > > database. But I don't know whether I can answer direct to an existing PR
 > > via the send-pr cgi script.
 > 
 > You can use a regular mailer, and cc: to FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org.
 > 
 > > Now to the problem. During the develop of the port eagle, I used a
 > > system where the linux_base was installed from the ports. This port
 > > requires the rpm port. Thus I thought, if I need 'rpm' to install a my
 > > rpm package, I need only check whether the linux_base port is installed
 > > or not. You are probably not using the port version, but the package of
 > > the linux_base and there is no rpm package installation before, thus
 > > installing the port eagle will fail because there is no 'rpm'.
 > 
 > That would not be linux_base's fault.  BUILD_DEPENDS is only valid for
 > the build target.  It doesn't work for any other target.
 > 
 > > --- Makefile.orig       Mon Apr  9 15:10:28 2001
 > > +++ Makefile    Mon Apr  9 14:16:49 2001
 > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 > >
 > >  USE_LINUX=   yes
 > >  USE_LINUX_PREFIX=    yes
 > > +RUN_DEPENDS= rpm:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm
 > >
 > >  NO_PACKAGE=  yes
 > >  NO_BUILD=    yes
 > 
 > I believe your solution is correct, too.
 > 
 > --
 > wca
 Hi,
 
 I'm a little uncertain, whether you need more things from me that EAGLE
 will become a port or not. The state of PR ports/26313 is still
 analysed. Or is the port on the way?
 
 Thanks,
 
 the impatient Harald

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104230900.f3N906244400>