Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:37:27 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pccard re-attach after ACPI S1 resume Message-ID: <20020916073727.GA760@laptop.6bone.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020913.094755.08630187.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20020912205654.GB1602@laptop.6bone.nl> <XFMail.20020912171224.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20020913.094755.08630187.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:47:55AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : Well, Warner is Mr. Newcard, so it is really his opinion that matters. :) > : Logically since we always do a detach() in suspend() I think we should > : always do an attach() on resume() but just silently fail if there is no > : card. Imagine if you suspended with a card in and then ejected it. You > : would still get a bunch of warning message from attach() when instead it > : should just handle the situation quietly. :) > > This is basically right. Having special flags on suspend is bogus. Any part of this in the pipe for committing? Thanks Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020916073727.GA760>