Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Nov 1998 01:21:13 -0500
From:      john hood <cgull@owl.org>
To:        Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>
Cc:        committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: fdisk.c
Message-ID:  <19981110012113.50088@owl.org>
In-Reply-To: <199810311049.CAA10189@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Sat, Oct 31, 1998 at 02:49:25AM -0800
References:  <199810311049.CAA10189@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 31, 1998 at 02:49:25AM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote:
> I was looking at my source tree and found this, left over from the
> time I was looking at new Windoze partition types.  Can people comment 
> on this?
> 
> I believe the "/" and "/usr" of XENIX is actually a boot partition
> vs. regular filesystems.  Also, Concurrent CPM, if it has anything to
> do with CP/M, should be spelled that way.

Xenix/386 used a single partition (slice) with multiple slices
(partitions-- yes, their terminology was exactly the reverse of ours).
I think these partition IDs, or at least their description strings,
were for the Xenix that IBM sold for the PC-AT.  I can't remember what
ID Xenix/386 used, or if it was different.

  --jh

-- 
Mr. Belliveau said, "the difference was the wise,       John Hood,     cgull
intelligent look on the face of the cow."  He was      	                   @
*so* right.  --Ofer Inbar                                            owl.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981110012113.50088>