Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 04:46:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey) Cc: brian@awfulhak.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc & rc.conf Message-ID: <199709140446.VAA08907@usr08.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <19970914101350.06261@lemis.com> from "Greg Lehey" at Sep 14, 97 10:13:50 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This is a disaster waiting to happen: > > I'm sorry, I must be too stupid. What's wrong with that? And how > does your fix fix it? Since the flags and the -enable have been > separated, it seems that we *should* insist on the exact string YES > for the enable flags. 1) The logic is inverted from that of all similar code 2) The value "YES" means that flag values, if they should be later desired, can't be put in the string in order to activate the services with the requested flags, like you can for all similar code. At least, that's what I got out of it... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709140446.VAA08907>